We do both, so you get an honest answer instead of a sales pitch. Flutter wins when speed and budget matter — one codebase, two platforms. Native (Swift, Kotlin) wins when you need deep hardware integration, complex animations, or peak performance. On a discovery call we'll recommend one — and explain why.

A typical MVP goes from prototype to the App Store and Google Play in about 12 weeks: one week of discovery, then design and 2-week build sprints with TestFlight builds every Friday. Complex products take longer — you'll get an honest timeline after scoping, not a number we can't keep.

It depends on scope, but you won't get vague answers: after a discovery week you get a clear roadmap with a fixed first-sprint scope and budget. Cross-platform usually reduces cost by 30–40% versus building two native apps. We work in transparent 2-week sprints, so you always see what you're paying for.

No. AI accelerates every stage — research, prototyping, boilerplate, tests — but senior engineers own every result. Every line of code is reviewed by humans, covered by tests, and held to the same standard whether AI helped write it or not. That's how we ship faster without shipping worse.

You do — 100%, from day one. Full IP transfer is in the contract, the code lives in your repositories if you prefer, and we sign an NDA before the first call if needed.

You contract with Appventis OÜ, a company registered in Estonia — so you get an EU legal entity, EU jurisdiction, and GDPR compliance by default. Invoicing and payments work like with any European vendor.

You get a single point of contact who actually picks up the phone, plus direct access to the team in Slack. Weekly demos, sprint reviews, and full overlap with EU hours — 3–4 hours daily with the US East Coast.

We stay on. Store submission, ASO, analytics, and post-launch iterations — most of our clients continue with v1.1, v1.2, and beyond. You can keep the full team, scale down to support mode, or hand everything over to your in-house developers with full documentation.